Nature vs. Nurture in Oliver Twist Essay

divulge of all the questions that anyvirtuoso whitethorn have for the novel, Oliver Twist, one of the more common questions that dissolve occur is What determines a persons personality, decisions, actions, etc. Is spirit to strike? Or is it nurtures fault? Seeing as though Oliver was orphaned at birth and never had a real catch or siblings to look up to, this essay will focus on the nurture section of the question. Nurture, by definition, is the value of experiences, cultural influences, and learned actions/reactions in a growing offsprings sustenance. Nature is defined as the qualities with which people are born (including genetic make-up, stable personality traits, animals instincts, etc.) Oliver had some bad influences to decide that it whitethorn have been nature that had affected him the approximately in this situation. In all cases, the nature vs. nurture debate is one and the same.Caring for a child most assiduously is very important, tally to the definition of nurt ure, and within the story of Oliver Twist, the child never seemed to receive straitlaced nurturing from any of the parochial people or thieves that he had accompanied. devil writes the geek of Oliver in a way that seems to cement his stance in natures court that Oliver shape ups to be an innately good person. His experiences in the workhouse, the maltreatment he has to endure from Mr. Bumble and other characters, and his exposure to a life of crime does not make Oliver turn from good to bad. However, to assume that Dickens supports the idea that only nurture is responsible for determining a persons personality would be incorrect. In fact, other characters within the novel, call down that they are products of their environments.This means that characters such as Nancy, the Artful Dodger, and others have been mould by their experiences, which clearly supports nurtures side of the debate. From a scientific point of view, most psychologists agree that neither nature nor nurture crowd out be held completely responsible for the shaping of a persons personality. When faced with the nature vs. nurture debate in real situations, it is typically assumed that personality can be attributed partially to nature and partly to nurture. At first glance many of Dickenss characters appear to favor either nature or nurture, but further investigating shows that each character embodies traits that can be attributed to twain.In Oliver Twist, Dickens draws the assist to numerous issues. For example, there is a very clear theme of disapproval of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act (and its accompanying effects) throughout then novel. And bandage most of the other issues that Dickens includes in his writing are societal, he does bring up an interesting debate that has psychological roots. Although Oliver is surrounded by horrible situations, Dickens still had a tone of hope underscoring it all. At points, there were questions if that was because the reader knew what would happ en in the end. But Dickens intend Oliver Twist to be somewhat humorous.For example, by illustrating the dichotomy of the wealthy, fat parish leaders feasting while orphaned workhouse children starve on gruel. In conclusion, both sides to the debate of whether or not Oliver was most affected by nature or nurture remains to the opinion of the reader. Of course there may be certain circumstances as to which side the reader may favor and Dickens had probably pursued that route, intending for the reader to decide Olivers fate. The nature vs. nurture argument pertains to anyone who wishes for a good debate in their reading selections of Charles Dickens.